You have to\u00a0consider that everyone has the ability to grow, so what’s more important is the person’s\u00a0desire to grow and his\/her interest in this area. Just because someone isn’t physically compatible with you now doesn’t mean he\/she won’t be forever.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\nSo this is where it gets subjective. There are people to whom physical intimacy is very important. They need physical intimacy, they connect with their partners using sex as their language of love and perhaps as a form of release, and they don’t have any notion for or against premarital sex. So for these folks, one-night stands and flings are a norm, and they see sexual intimacy early on in a relationship as normal and necessary. If you are someone who doesn’t care too much about physical intimacy and sex isn’t your primary language of love, and you are with someone who prioritizes sexual intimacy above all things, then this connection is probably not going to work for long (unless one or both of you change in this area).<\/p>\n
But then there are people to whom physical intimacy is\u00a0important, but emotional\/mental compatibility is\u00a0even more important. To them, sex\/ physical intimacy is just one component of the relationship, so they focus on looking for a partner with whom they can connect emotionally\/mentally first, before looking at other areas. For such people, they select their partners based on\u00a0their emotional and mental connection first, and then let their physical\u00a0closeness with each other build up naturally, rather than filtering\u00a0people\u00a0based on physical intimacy.<\/p>\n
So I have a friend who was with her boyfriend for 3 years before they got married. During their courtship they weren’t sexually intimate, though her boyfriend was previously sexually involved with his exes. They were, however, kissing, hugging, cuddling, etc.. They are now happily married with a kid.<\/p>\n
For myself, my primary language of love is not physical touch; it’s communication and words. I like to speak to connect with my partner, to know how he is doing, and to know him on a deeper level. On the other hand, my husband had many relationships in the past and he was pretty much sexually involved with all his past partners, including flings and one-night stands.<\/p>\n
But this disparity didn’t\u00a0stop us from connecting deeply. For me, when I asked him what he thought about deferring sex, he said he didn’t care because the connection between us is stronger than what he had\u00a0ever\u00a0felt before. The whole notion of sex\u00a0early on in the relationship, later, after\u00a0marriage, or even never for some bizarre biological reason was a mere triviality. In a different relationship\u00a0he might have been concerned as he had encountered sexual incompatibility issues with some partners before, but\u00a0this concern simply didn’t come up for him with us. He said the whole thought of sex or no sex paled in comparison to what we have. I happen to think his views are a little extreme (no sex forever may be too much I think), but I wanted to share this as a differing point of view from the narrative we always hear (that men are all about sex).<\/p>\n
Now I’m not trying to say that sexual intimacy isn’t important. Sexual\/physical intimacy is important, and it is part and parcel of a successful relationship.<\/p>\n
Bu sexual\/physical intimacy, for the most part and for most couples, arises out of a strong emotional and mental compatibility. In the cases I’ve looked at,\u00a0couples supposedly dealing with an issue with a lack of physical spark or physical incompatibility are always invariably\u00a0dealing with emotional\/mental compatibility issues of some kind. Even though they may think that\u00a0they are dealing with a unique issue in\u00a0sexual\/physical incompatibility or mismatch in sex drives, there are usually underlying factors causing this issue, usually an incompatibility in other areas.<\/p>\n
For example, I knew\u00a0someone who divorced his wife because they didn’t have sex at all in their entire marriage of 3-4 years. While it looked like an issue of physical incompatibility, when I dug deeper, it turned out that there was never a real emotional or intellectual connection from the start, leading to sexual emptiness in the relationship.<\/p>\n
It is also important to note that there may be changes in our lives (such as work stress, down periods in life, etc.) that create\u00a0intimacy issues with our partners. This is again linked to emotional and life factors rather than real physical mismatches.<\/p>\n
Which brings me to this point:\u00a0My sense is that the “lack of physical spark” is possibly\u00a0not the real reason for your breakup<\/strong>. There is likely a missing compatibility in some other area (emotional, shared visions, shared values, aspirations, whichever it is) that caused physical spark to become an issue and the\u00a0<\/em>issue, hence causing the breakup.<\/p>\nNow, this isn’t a bad thing. Rather I think it’s a good thing that both of you broke up, because the point is that there was some incompatibility that caused “physical spark” to be an issue. So say you change yourself hugely to fill the gap in “physical spark” due to your ex’s complaints. Not only would you become a different person from your natural self, but you would also find yourself having to change more things to keep the relationship afloat, to fill up other areas of incompatibility. Or say your ex was truly looking for a lot of physical intimacy and it was the sole and only issue. Then the relationship simply wouldn’t work because that’s not how you naturally are or at least that’s not how you feel when you are around him (and there’s nothing wrong with this).<\/p>\n
How to Build Physical “Spark”<\/h2>\n
So how should we deal with situations where there’s really a lack of physical spark,\u00a0but there’s a strong emotional\/mental connection? Like I said, I think most couples dealing with a lack of physical spark or physical incompatibility are really\u00a0dealing with issues with other kinds of compatibility.\u00a0There are exceptions where the gap in physical compatibility is really due to non-relationship factors (like a real biological mismatch or one’s deep-set fear towards physical intimacy), but those are\u00a0the\u00a0exceptions.\u00a0Meaning if someone feels\u00a0a lack of physical spark with their partner, I’d advise to look at the relationship\u00a0fundamentals first vs.\u00a0focusing on\u00a0the physical component\u00a0which is usually the effect.<\/p>\n
But say\u00a0you feel emotionally and mentally compatible with someone, and you’re fearful about being physically incompatible with him\/her. What should you do?<\/p>\n
Firstly,\u00a0think of physical intimacy as\u00a0a spectrum, not a binary “yes it’s there, no it’s not there” thing<\/strong>. Meaning, I wouldn’t worry about having instant\u00a0physical\u00a0chemistry with someone from that first act of\u00a0intimacy (kissing, cuddling, etc.), but about building this chemistry over time.<\/p>\nSecondly,\u00a0think of physical intimacy as having\u00a0many stages<\/strong>. Kissing, hugging, cuddling, french kissing, petting, and so on.\u00a0Even within each stage there are various degrees of progression.<\/strong> Depending on one’s comfort with physical closeness, some of these stages may only be done after marriage or later on in the\u00a0relationship. Either way,\u00a0you can already work on building chemistry within your range of comfort.\u00a0For example, maybe\u00a0you had a weird first kiss with your partner. Slobbery, wet, weird.\u00a0But adopt a fun-loving, experimental\u00a0mindset\u00a0towards it and allow yourself to keep trying.<\/p>\nAfter a few tries, and as both of you\u00a0get familiar with each other’s lips and kissing styles, kissing starts to feel normal\u00a0between the both of you, and it starts to become something that you look forward to! Same for hugging, cuddling, french kissing, and any other physical activity.<\/p>\n
Thirdly,\u00a0let’s say there is zero connection\u00a0when you kiss, hug, and\u00a0even when you see your partner<\/em>\u00a0\u2014 like you don’t feel excited\/happy at all when you see him\/her. AND, you still don’t feel any connection\u00a0after many\u00a0weeks and\u00a0months of being together. THEN\u00a0yes,\u00a0there may be\u00a0a problem, and\u00a0this is something you should talk\u00a0about\u00a0with your partner, to let him\/her know how you feel, that there’s this issue, to understand the blockage, and so on.<\/p>\nEndnote<\/h2>\n
In short, I wouldn’t worry too much about achieving an instant physical spark with someone\u00a0or having no spark with future romantic prospects, unless you have\u00a0some deeply rooted issues with intimacy (which I don’t think is the case for you, and\u00a0which would be a separate\u00a0thing\u00a0altogether). Physical chemistry and compatibility is something you build with your partner, through open communication, understanding each other’s likes and dislikes, and an openness to explore new things.<\/p>\n
Everyone has the ability to grow and develop,\u00a0and one’s physical preference and inclination doesn’t stay fixed forever.\u00a0Also,\u00a0when you love someone and you’re emotionally connected, you will naturally want to be close with him\/her\u00a0vs. forcing yourself to kiss\/ be intimate with him\/her. It’s your role, as much as it’s your partner’s role,\u00a0to build on your\u00a0physical chemistry together vs. it being something that magically happens.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, by looking at physical intimacy as something that grows organically and adopting an open and fun-loving\u00a0mindset\u00a0towards it, it\u00a0puts less pressure on you and helps you focus on building your connection with your partner, which\u00a0then provides the\u00a0foundation\u00a0on which\u00a0strong physical intimacy is built on. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n
Also read:<\/p>\n
\n- Are Looks Important in a Marriage Decision?<\/a><\/li>\n
- I Get Nervous When I See an Attractive Guy\/Woman. What Should I Do?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Couple kissing (Image:\u00a0stephen frith) “Hey Celes, I recently broke up […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":437,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=435"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":438,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions\/438"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/revolutionapparel.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}